Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage: New Ground of Divorce.

Law Minister recently moved in the Upper House of Parliament Bill to amend the Hindu Marriage Act. Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill 2010 in provision relating to divorce. Two major amendments are as follows:

  1. In Section 13B which provides for divorce by mutual consent in two consecutive motions, the requirement is that a couple, staying separately for at least one year, can file the first motion before District Judge and the second motion is 6 moths thereafter but before 18 months from the first motion. Since many a times one of the parties do not support the second motion, the remaining party has to then fight the battle through contested divorce than mutual. In the proposed amendment, the second motion has been done away with. Meaning thereby, divorce by mutual consent can be possible only by moving the first petition subject to the Judge finding everything OK.
  2. Second amendment is insertion of Section 13C incorporating irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a new ground for divorce. This clause is missing in the Act so far. The newly inserted provision though has a multi tier process for a District Judge to go through before declaring the wedding as broken down irretrievably.

Furthermore, the wife, in such a petition of the husband, can challenge it on the ground of financial hardship for herself, and of children if any. The District Judge has a discretion to dismiss the petition of the husband then or make sure that the husband makes arrangement for the wife, and children if any.

Logic of including such alimony apart, biggest worry I find in this newly inserted ground is that a couple need to have lived separately for at least three years before approaching the District Judge for a decree of divorce.

Imagine a situation where a guy is 27 years of age at the time of marriage. After 2 years, marriage seems to have broken down irretrievably.

Age is now 29.

Couple have to live separately for the next three years. At 32, he approaches the Court for a decree of divorce. Now if the wife wants to contest the matter, the Judge will take Her own time and allowing or rejecting husband’s petition. Add couple of years. At 35 divorce is final, guy wanted the divorce at 29. At 35, his chances of settling down are poor. Same maths goes for the wife as well.

Lets see how the law finally turns out at the ground level. Times of India reports that the law is women friendly and wife shall get a share in the property of the husband. Such reporting, though which required a lot of research, itself is sufficient to make Govt realize that the law should be seen as non partisan. Already matrimonial laws are so skewed in favour of females that it is a constant risk of property and of personal liberty of the husband and his family who get dragged into uncalled for litigation and harassment more often than not.

Though my reading of the Bill does not concur with the Times headline. Anyway, I do read The Hindu since I was a kid. That said, the Bill talks about making financial arrangement for the wife and the kids, if there is any. The so called reference to share in husband’s property is something I could not find and would request Times only to assist me.

Through this post, I’m not advising that couple should start getting divorces at the drop of a hat. But when two adults decide they cannot live with each other, why to present a situation before them which makes it worse than ever for them to seek a remedy?



Filed under In Accordance With Law

16 responses to “Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage: New Ground of Divorce.

  1. SFF

    Pls read the amended 13F : Special provision reating to share in imovable and movable property in procedings under 13C.

  2. yukti gupta

    I concur with ur views. Matrimonial laws are female friendly. These laws are being misused by women dese days. On a daily basis, it is being observed by the courts that frivolous complaints n divorce cases are being filed by women. Though we do have some genuine cases but there quantum is much less as compared to cases dragging husbands to courts for extracting money n only money. One such instance is asking husband to pay the amount spent on the wedding. I fail to understand that y husband shud bear the cost of the marriage alone when the women was equally present in the so called ceremonial facade. Please note, I m a female too n therefore, I m nt anti -women. It’s just an observation from practical experience n this has no reference to any genuine cases.

    • Thanks for your comments Yukti.

    • tasleem

      Hi I am an Indian got married in India on July 5 2012, and came to USA on august and I was living with my husband for four months together, he was abusive and since I reported to the police officer, he fled to India leaving me. Am still alone in USA.I am in need of divorce from him. he cannot enter United states because there is a warrant in his name. Now he was requesting for a divorce from me,through one of his lawyer, SInce I dont have any plans to come to India right now. He deserted me from NOv 27 2012 .we decide to get divorce form American law. Mutual consent. The process works like this, He signs the divorce papers and sends me so that I sign it and we will file in American law, My question is that in that divorce which is stated (I mean the documents) It was mentioned irretrievably broken marriage.

      My question is

      1.will this Mutual divorce be accepted in India also?

      • There was a case in Delhi High Court where a marriage between Indians which took place in India under the rituals of Hindu Marriage Act was held to be NOT dissolved by a no-fault decree of divorce in US Courts. I suggest you seek proper legal guidance from matrimonial counsel before taking any decision.

        All the best.


      • Philip

        Did you get answer to this? Here in US, mutual consent is using “irretrievably broken ” – in India they are 2 different things. I am confused.

  3. dhanpatmal ka dost dushyant ka

    Nav een whistle blower
    Dheengu. Nitin
    And mor.

  4. rajesh

    Is it mandatory that both should be living apart for one year for getting a divorce on mutual consent/ Is there a way to get divorce even if living under the same roof? Kindly explain

  5. g

    Nitin dhingra
    khurana naveen
    Dhingra nitin
    Navee. Khurana

  6. Thanks for sharing great information on Divorce law in India.
    Top Best Divorce Lawyers in Delhi

  7. What’s up, all is going perfectly here and ofcourse every one
    is sharing information, that’s really good, keep up

  8. Spot on witɦ this write-up, I seriously believe that this amazing site
    needs muϲh more attention. I’ll probably ƅe back again to
    read through more, thanks for thhe advice!

  9. Nice answers in return of this query with firm arguments and telling everything regarding that.

  10. Divorce Evidence

    kit and facts for parents in divorce on what is best for children to

    obtain equal custody in family court.

  11. Keshav Sharma

    Hi All ‘

    Can you read my petition on and sign if in agreement . Also can you please share this widely so that there is some traction to this petition . Thanks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s